Table 4.

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for overweight and regression coefficients for percent body fat and lean body mass in relation to birthweight and placental size, in the offspring of tall mothers (height >160 cm) who were carriers of the Pro12Pro genotype.

	Overweight*	Body fat (%)+	Lean body mass (kg)+
Birth weight (z)	1.20 (0.98 to 1.47)	0.41 (−0.19 to 1.01)	1.48 (0.87 to 2.09)
P for trend	0.08	0.2	<0.001
Ponderal index (z)	1.18 (0.97 to 1.43)	0.32 (−0.28 to 0.91)	0.61 (0.00 to 1.21)
P for trend	0.1	0.3	0.05
Placental weight (z)	1.18 (0.97 to 1.44)	0.28 (−0.31 to 0.87)	0.99 (0.39 to 1.60)
P for trend	0.1	0.4	0.001
Max placental diam (z)	1.28 (1.03 to 1.59)	0.51 (−0.14 to 1.16)	0.97 (0.30 to 1.64)
P for trend	0.02	0.1	0.005
Lesser placental diam (z)	1.34 (1.10 to 1.64)	0.85 (0.24 to 1.46)	1.03 (0.40 to 1.66)
P for trend	0.004	0.006	0.001
Placental area (z)	1.37 (1.10 to 1.71)	0.77 (0.12 to 1.42)	1.09 (0.42 to 1.75)
P for trend	0.005	0.02	0.001
Pro12Ala & Ala12Ala
Birth weight (z)	0.93 (0.68 to 1.28)	−0.22 (−1.11 to 0.66)	1.41 (0.48 to 2.35)
P for trend	0.7	0.6	0.003
Ponderal index (z)	1.06 (0.81 to 1.40)	0.89 (0.18 to 1.61)	0.31 (−0.48 to 1.09)
P for trend	0.7	0.01	0.4
Placental weight (z)	0.85 (0.64 to 1.12)	−0.56 (−1.37 to 0.24)	0.50 (−0.37 to 1.37)
P for trend	0.3	0.2	0.3
Max placental diam (z)	0.75 (0.56 to 0.99)	−0.58 (−1.37 to 0.20)	0.41 (−0.44 to 1.26)
p for trend	0.04	0.1	0.3
Lesser placental diam (z)	0.88 (0.66 to 1.16)	−0.05 (−0.84 to 0.73)	−0.15 (−1.00 to 0.69)
P for trend	0.4	0.9	0.7
Placental area (z)	0.80 (0.61 to 1.04)	−0.27 (−1.02 to 0.49)	0.12 (−0.69 to 0.93)
P for trend	0.1	0.5	0.8

*Odds ratios from multiple logistic regressions, including age and gender, with overweight as outcome.

⁺Coefficients from multiple linear regressions, including age and gender, with body fat percent or lean body mass as outcome.