Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 21;83(5):1514–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.023

Table 1.

Characteristics of Original and Validation Datasets

Characteristic Original patients (n=85) Validation patients (n=83) p-value* All patients (n=168)
Age - median (range) 57 (14–86) 59 (35–89) 0.06 58 (14–89)
Gender
 Female 12 (14) 7 (8) 19 (11)
 Male 73 (86) 76 (92) 0.33 149 (89)
T-classification
 T0 2 (2) - 2 (1)
 T1 12 (14) 20 (24) 32 (19)
 T2 25 (29) 26 (31) 51 (30)
 T3 18 (21) 24 (29) 42 (25)
 T4 28 (33) 13 (16) 0.05 41 (24)
N-classification
 N0 10 (12) 9 (11) 19 (11)
 N1 6 (7) 11 (13) 17 (10)
 N2 59 (69) 56 (67) 115 (68)
 N3 10 (12) 7 (8) 0.37 17 (10)
Tumor site
 Oropharynx 45 (53) 64 (77) 109 (65)
 Larynx 4 (5) 6 (7) 10 (6)
 Hypopharynx 8 (9) 5 (6) 13 (8)
 Nasopharynx 22 (26) 8 (10) 30 (18)
 Oral Cavity 4 (5) - 4 (2)
 Unknown primary 2 (2) - 0.003 2 (1)
p16INK4a status (oropharynx subset only)
 Positive 17 (33) 47 (73) 64 (59)
 Negative 2 (4) 8 (13) 1.00** 10 (9)
 Unknown 33 (63) 9 (14) 35 (32)
Pathology grade
 Low 2 (2) 2 (2) 4 (2)
 Medium 29 (34) 31 (37) 60 (36)
 High 44 (52) 35 (42) 79 (47)
 Unknown 10 (12) 15 (18) 0.4 25 (15)
Karnofsky performance status
 ≤60 2 (2) 1 (1) 3 (2)
 70 9 (11) 7 (8) 16 (10)
 80 14 (16) 22 (27) 36 (21)
 90 59 (69) 43 (52) 102 (61)
 100 1 (1) 3 (4) 4 (2)
 Unknown - 7 (8) 0.45 7 (4)
*

p-value refers to the difference between the original and validation patients. Continuous variables (age) were analyzed with a t-test; nominal variables (age, tumor site, p16INK4a status) were analyzed with Fisher’s exact tests; and ordinal variables (tumor stage, nodal stage, KPS, pathology grade) were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

**

this comparison refers only to patients with known p16INK4a status.