Skip to main content
. 2012 May;23(5):915–933. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011101032

Table 4.

Details of cases of discordance between Sanger sequencing and NGS

Variant Description Ped ID Pt ID Gene Exon/IVS Codon cDNA change Protein Comment
Variants detected by Sanger sequencing but not by NGS (n=10) M368 R1700 PKD1 1 37 c.108_109insC p.Cys37fs76X Lack of coverage
M615 R1953 PKD1 11 845 c.2534T>C p.Leu845Ser Mutant percentage below threshold
M499 R2001 PKD1 12 960 c.2879G>A p.Gly960Asp Mutant percentage below threshold
M152 R1432 PKD1 15 1362 c.4084C>T p.Ser1362Pro Mutant percentage below threshold
M118 R95 PKD1 15 2212 c.6635G>A p.Ser2212Asn Mutant percentage below threshold
2215 c.6644G>A p.Arg2215Gln Mutant percentage below threshold
M307 R1573 PKD1 IVS20 2621 c.7864-2A>G p.2621fs Mutant percentage below threshold
M307 R1581 PKD1 IVS20 2621 c.7864-2A>G p.2621fs Mutant percentage below threshold
P387 OX2242 PKD1 25 3016 c.9047A>G p.Gln3016Arg Mutant percentage below threshold
P229 OX1056 PKD1 IVS31 3390 c.10170+25_+45delCTGGGGGTCCTGGGCTGGG p.Gln3390fs NextGENe score below threshold
Variants detected by NGS but missed during the original Sanger sequencing analysis (n=2) M453 R1930 PKD1 15 2250 c.6749C>T p.Thr2250Met Operator-caused error
M412 R1380 PKD1 26 3081 c.9241T>C p.Cys3081Arg Allele dropout