Skip to main content
. 2012 May 15;54(Suppl 4):S266–S272. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir992

Table 3.

Distribution of Errors at Drug Resistance Mutation Sites, Compared With Sequence Heterogeneity

Base Composition
Mixtures at DRM Sites
Errors at DRM Sites
Panel Specimen No. Mixed No. Unmixed % Mixed % Mixed, no Nsa PR RT Total PR RT Total
1 1 9 870 1.02% 0.11% 1 0 1 10 1 11
2 1 878 0.11% 0.11% 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 878 0.11% 0.11% 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 18 861 2.05% 0.92% 2 0 2 9 0 9
5 17 883 1.89% 1.12% 3 0 3 11 0 11
2 1 6 873 0.68% 0.00% 0 0 0 1 4 5
2 8 871 0.91% 0.80% 2 0 2 14 8 22
3 0 879 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0 4 4
4 6 873 0.68% 0.23% 2 0 2 14 12 26
5 1 878 0.11% 0.00% 0 0 0 3 4 7
3 1 0 879 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0 2 2
2 16 863 1.80% 0.90% 3 0 3 24 2 26
3 1 878 0.10% 0.00% 0 0 0 2 12 14
4 2 877 0.20% 0.00% 0 0 0 16 13 29b
5 15 864 1.70% 0.80% 1 0 1 3 22 25
4 1 27 852 3.07% 1.50% 2 1 3 13 0 13
2 0 879 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 9 9 18
3 18 861 2.05% 0.81% 3 2 5 26 19 45
4 19 860 2.16% 2.16% 0 5 5 8 49 57
5 25 854 2.84% 0.81% 4 2 6 24 13 37

Abbreviations: DRM, drug resistance mutation; PR, protease; RT, reverse transcriptase.

a

Not counting Ns because these are ignored in scoring.

b

Twenty-four of these discrepancies were a result of the wrong sequence being submitted (possible contamination).