Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2011 Jun;42(2):83–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00268.x

Table 2.

Logistic regression estimates of the effects of spousal communication on the odds of using one of four contraceptive methods, Chitwan Valley, Nepal, 1996–2006

Male sterilization
Female sterilization
Depo-Provera
Condoms
Independent variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8
Family planning discussion
 Wife’s report 1.79*** 1.60* 1.49** 1.45*
 Husband’s report 1.30* 1.25 1.11 2.06***
Childbearing experiences and preferences
 Number of children ever born by 1996 1.11 1.19* 1.08 1.19 1.08 1.10 1.81*** 1.80***
 Number of children ever died by 1996 0.69* 0.69* 1.12 1.05 1.24 1.28 0.35*** 0.36***
 Both spouses prefer no more children 0.93 0.96 0.84 0.76 1.02 1.06 0.68 0.64*
Couple’s background information
 Participation in spouse selection 1.06 1.05 1.14* 1.11 0.95 0.93 1.01 0.98
 Wife’s education 0.87 0.92 0.70 0.62* 0.90 0.87 2.59*** 2.91***
 Husband’s education 1.04 0.81 0.73 0.58* 1.16 1.00 1.01 0.70
 Household owns house plot 0.99 1.01 1.05 1.13 0.91 0.88 0.74 0.81
Age
 Wife aged 15–24 in 1996 1.81** 1.81** 1.72* 2.14** 1.23 1.23 1.59* 1.37
 Wife aged 25–34 in 1996 (r) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Husband aged 15–24 in 1996 0.89 1.01 1.11 1.37 1.28 1.48* 1.72* 1.95*
 Husband aged 25–56 in 1996 (r) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ethnic group
 Upper Caste Hindu (r) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Lower Caste Hindu 0.35*** 0.29*** 0.88 0.66 2.07** 2.00** 0.26** 0.31*
 Newar 1.00 0.98 3.28* 4.38* 1.69 1.91* 0.65 0.70
 Hill Tibeto-Burmese 0.34*** 0.32*** 0.71 0.71 1.90** 1.74* 0.59 0.56
 Terai Tibeto-Burmese 0.55* 0.51* 1.87 1.71 0.72 0.70 0.51 0.48*
Access to contraceptives (minutes walk to nearest health post) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99* 0.99 0.99
Durationa 1.19* 1.25* 2.21*** 2.63*** 0.75** 0.76** 0.37*** 0.37***
Duration squared 0.97** 0.96** 0.92*** 0.91*** 1.01 1.00 1.08*** 1.08***
Person-months 39,975 35,954 39,975 35,954 28,362 25,295 35,356 31,442
−2 Log likelihood 337,180 300,127 385,479 347,141 225,988 202,008 351,270 310,570
*

One-tailed test significant at p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.

a

Duration measured in years since baseline interview, precise to the month.