Table 7. The comparing results summary of Jain, Han, Srihari, Sun and our methods.

Method	Database(pairs×members×fingers ×times)	Matcher	Matching Results(Identical-twin vs. Non-twin)	Class Correlation(Identical-twin vs. randomly chosen)
Jain [2]	94×2×1×1 (184)	Minutiae [18]	FAR: 2-6% higher	0.7750 vs. 0.2718
Han [5]	66×2×3×10	Minutiae [5]	EER: 1-2% higher	0.6455 vs. 0.1373Base on Tab. 2 [5]
Srihari [6]	298×2×10×1	NFIS [19]	FPR:6.17% vs. 2.91%	0.5500 vs. 0.3200
Sun [7]	51×2×4×2	VeriFinger [14]	EER:6.79% vs. 4.40%	NA
Our Method	83×2×4×6	P071 [13]	EER:8.67% vs.5.94%	0.7440 vs. 0.3215
		VeriFinger [14]	EER: 5.83% vs. 5.38%