Table 2. Looking at the target/person plate in the Counterproductive condition (Condition 3) for dogs in each group.
non-soc enh | local enh | stim enh | ost enh | voice | gaze | voice+gaze | hand-to-mouth | |
mean in % | 57.46 | 60.55 | 79.53 | 85.16 | 65.01 | 68.07 | 72.73 | 80.59 |
non-soc enh | 1 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | <0.001 | |
local enh | 1 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.002 | |
stimulus enh | <0.001 | 0.006 | 1 | 0.27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
ostensive enh | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 1 | |
voice | 1 | 1 | 0.27 | <0.001 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | |
gaze | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
voice+gaze | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 0.04 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
hand-to-mouth | <0.001 | 0.002 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | 1 | 1 |
Results (p-values) of the between group post-hoc comparisons (with Bonferroni corrections).