Skip to main content
. 2001 Jun 23;322(7301):1511–1516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511

Table 1.

Participants, interventions, and outcomes assessed in 10 randomised controlled trials of multidisciplinary treatments for chronic low back pain (LBP)

Author, year of index publication Participants* Multidisciplinary intervention Comparison treatment Outcomes measured Notes
Alaranta, 199415 293 workers with LBP for ⩾6 months in Finland selected by insurer 126 h inpatient functional restoration and a home programme Three week inpatient programme. PM, exercises, back school Insurance records, mobility, strength, pain, function, and psychological scales at 3 and 12 months Workers less disabled than in other trials
Basler, 199725 94 patients with chronic LBP referred to three pain clinics in Germany 12 cognitive-behavioural sessions plus usual medical treatment at the clinic Usual medical treatment at clinic Self reported pain, function, medication intake, and coping with pain immediately after treatment Only short term follow up available, as control patients received intervention afterwards
Bendix, 199618 106 patients with LBP ⩾6 months, unemployed or on sick leave, referred to back centre in Denmark 135 h outpatient functional restoration Not treated at back centre; could go anywhere else for treatment Back endurance and self reported pain, function, employment status, and contacts with healthcare system over 5 years Outcomes at 4 months, 2 years, and 5 years reported in separate articles
Bendix, 199517 132 patients with LBP ⩾6 months, unemployed or on sick leave, referred to back centre in Denmark Two interventions: 135 h outpatient functional restoration, or 24 h outpatient psycho-physical training 24 h outpatient physical training plus back school Back endurance and self reported pain, function, employment status, and contacts with healthcare system over 5 years Outcomes at 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years reported in separate articles
Harkäpää, 198921 476 blue collar workers with chronic or recurrent LBP ⩾2 years in Finland, selected by insurer Two interventions: 3 weeks of inpatient PM, massage, exercise, relaxation, or 15 outpatient sessions of PM, exercise, relaxation Assessment by a specialist in physical medicine plus printed and oral advice Insurance records, mobility, strength, self reported pain, disability, and overall benefit over 30 months Outcomes at 3 months and 30 months reported in separate articles
Jückel, 199026 71 patients with LBP ⩾6 months, on waiting list to attend spa hospital in Germany 4-6 weeks of inpatient hydrotherapy, PM, exercise, massage Waiting list controls Self reported pain, function, depression, and anxiety immediately after treatment Only short term follow up available, as controls received intervention afterwards
Lukinmaa, 198916 209 patients with LBP >2 months, referred by general practitioners to regional hospital in Finland 5 days of inpatient assessment followed by individualised treatment 30 minute assessment and recommendations by orthopaedic surgeon and nurse Insurance records and self reported pain, global improvement, R&M, and healthcare use over 12 months A few patients had LBP <3 months, some were still employed
Mitchel, 199429 420 workers off work ⩾90 days after work injury, selected by insurer in Canada 280 h outpatient functional restoration Usual treatment in the community plus mailed advice to primary care provider Insurance records over 2 years Corey et al30 reported pain ratings and self reported employment status in a subset
Nicholas, 199228 20 patients with LBP >6 months, referred by pain clinic and physicians in Australia 17.5 h outpatient cognitive-behavioral therapy, PM, education, and exercise 17.5 h outpatient “attention control,” PM, education, and exercise Self reported pain, SIP, medication use, pain beliefs, depression, self efficacy, and coping over 6 months Extensive assessment, numerous dropouts
Nicholas, 199127 58 patients with LBP >6 months, referred by pain clinic and physicians in Australia Four outpatient psycho-physical interventions of 17.5 h each Two controls: 17.5 h outpatient “attention control”, education, and exercise, or education and exercise only Self reported pain, SIP, medication use, pain beliefs, anxiety, depression, and coping over 12 months Extensive assessment, numerous dropouts

PM=physical modalities such as heat or cold applications and transcutaneos nerve stimulation (manual therapies and exercise are listed separately if described in the article); SIP=sickness impact profile; R&M=Roland and Morris disability index. 

*

Number of patients with low back pain randomised in the trial, except for Alaranta 1994 (number noted is after excluding 85 patients for medical reasons) and Mitchel 1994 (number noted is after excluding workers allocated to a third clinic, because of protocol violations). The number of patients followed up varied depending on the outcome and follow up time considered. In studies that included patients with other chronic pain syndromes, only patientss with low back pain were counted.