Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2012 Jan 23;48(5):1327–1342. doi: 10.1037/a0026978

Table 4.

Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimate-Missing at Random (MLE-MAR) Estimates of Dynamical Parameters (and t-values) Based on Four Separate Bivariate Latent Change Score Models with a Fixed Ordinal Measurement Model (Threshold Parameters based on Table 3)

(a) Male Hawaiian (n = 2,531) (b) Male Non-Hawaiian (n = 1,192) (c) Female Hawaiian (n = 2,286) (d) Female Non-Hawaiian (n = 1,184)
μWCESD −.16 (−2.37) −.10 (−1.20) −.09 (−3.32) −.11 (−1.07)
μGPA .04 (1.50) .08 (1.91) −.02 (−0.40) .002 (0.04)
βWCESD −.98 (−11.1) −1.02 (−9.61) −.86 (−3.79) −.65 (−3.78)
βGPA .42 (1.09) .26 (0.73) −.07 (−0.18) .25 (0.67)
γGPA → WCESD −.45 (−1.76) −.22 (−0.77) −.34 (−0.69) .15 (0.33)
γWCESD → GPA −.72 (−2.72) −.92 (−6.22) −.99 (−7.24) −.65 (−2.78)
χ2 81 74 42 63
df 52 51a 52 50b
εa .015 .014 .000 .015

Notes:

a

indicates that there is no response in one category in WCESD, thus one less df.

b

indicates that there is no response in the last category in WCESD in Grades 9 and 10, with the highest threshold parameter rendered un-estimable.

Variances of all slope components are fixed at 1.0 for simplicity.

εa = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation.