Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):88–97. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181f6ca45

Table 1.

A list of all implanted canals of four rhesus monkeys, the status of whether vestibular ECAPs were detectable (>50 µV in N1-P1 amplitude growth), and the primary direction of eye movements that reached a minimum velocity criterion (>20 degree/sec).

Animal Implanted Canals ECAP1 Eye Movements2
Monkey A Lateral Yes Horizontal
Posterior Yes 3 Vertical
Monkey B Lateral Yes Horizontal
Monkey C Lateral Yes Horizontal
Superior No None 4
Monkey D Lateral No None
Posterior No None
1

A minimum N1-P1 amplitude of 50 µV was adopted as threshold for indicating the presence or absences of an ECAP.

2

A threshold velocity of 20 dec/sec was used for determining the presence of an EEM.

3

High-amplitude stimulus artifacts were recorded when the stimulating and recording electrodes were both in the posterior canal. However, ECAP waveforms were observed when stimulating in the posterior canal and recording in the lateral canal.

4

Subthreshold EEM nystagmus could only be observed at high current levels that were close to the maximum limit of the device output.