Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2012 Jan 6;72(13):1389–1398. doi: 10.1002/pros.22484

Table 5.

Multivariate analyses evaluating determinants of discordance between biopsy-derived Gleason patterns assigned by final (gold standard”) expert review and those documented in pathology reports

Determinants of disagreement Any discordance Discordance by two or more categories*
Diagnosis age: OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
 <65 years 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 ≥65 years 2.06 (1.45, 2.92) 2.84 (1.27, 6.35)
Race:
 White 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 Black 1.23 (0.59, 2.55) 0.89 (0.36, 2.25)
Area, based measure of SES**
 Low 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 High 1.15 (0.83, 1.60) 0.75 (0.38, 1.45)
Disease stage
 Localized 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 Regional/Distant 2.78 (1.54, 5.02) 3.92 (1.47, 10.41)
PSA at diagnosis
 <10 ng/ml 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 ≥10 ng/ml 1.37 (0.67, 2.82) 2.41 (0.77, 7.53)
 Not reported/missing 1.69 (0.78, 3.65) 2.81 (1.00, 7.95)
Facility type:
 Freestanding laboratories 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
 University hospitals 1.70 (1.16, 2.48) 1.17 (0.62, 2.23)
 Large community hospitals 2.08 (1.37, 3.16) 1.63 (0.77, 3.44)
 Small community hospitals 2.98 (1.73, 5.14) 2.54 (0.92, 7.02)
*

Gleason’s patterns were ranked in ascending order based on a total score followed by a primary pattern as shown in Tables 24. For example, 3+4=7 was followed by 4+3=7, followed by 3+5=8, followed by 4+4=8, tec.

**

Defined based on percent population in a census tract living below poverty level: low SES ≥10%, high SES <10%