Skip to main content
. 2001 Jun 1;2(6):research0019.1–research0019.12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-6-research0019

Table 2.

Expression of arginine operons when cells were grown with methionine or with MTR as the sulfur source

Gene and
Met MTR Ratio
spot
argB a 1286 907 1.43
argB b 1329 928
argC a 1116 735 1.61
argC b 1145 666
argD a 930 592 1.62
argD b 1014 605
argE a 340 246 1.27
argE b 446 372
argF a 699 406 1.77
argF b 717 392
argG a 2304 1896 1.28
argG b 2827 2121
argH a 2165 1120 1.94
argH b 2237 1147
argJ a 1045 509 1.94
argJ b 1051 569
argS a 991 838 1.16
argS b 984 858
carA a 2329 2046 1.12
carA b 2326 2094
carB a 932 635 1.47
carB b 912 618
yqzE a 680 460 1.57
yqzE b 685 407
yqiX a 2190 1401 1.58
yqiX b 2264 1412
yqiY a 750 585 1.41
yqiY b 876 571
yqiZ a 1527 926 1.70
yqiZ b 1595 907

cDNA hybridization after growth in methionine or MTR. The conditions are chosen to display roughly identical values for most genes in both conditions. The values obtained for the arginine operons described in the text are shown here. They indicate a higher expression in methionine as compared to MTR, all things being otherwise equal. Each spot in the experiment is referred to as a and b.