Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):481–485. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.005

Table 3.

Prevalence of weight control strategies and strategies associated with losing ≥5% and ≥10% body weight

Strategy Prevalence among all obese participants, % ≥5% weight loss OR (95% CI)* ≥10% weight loss OR (95% CI)*
Ate less food 65.0 ** **

Exercised
 No (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 55.1 1.29 (1.05, 1.60) 1.36 (1.12, 1.65)

Ate less fat
 No (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 43.7 1.41 (1.14, 1.75) 1.37 (1.04, 1.79)

Drank lots of water
 No (ref) 1.00
 Yes 40.5 1.24 (0.99, 1.56) **

Switched to foods with lower calories 40.5 ** **

Skipped meals
 No (ref) 1.00
 Yes 18.5 ** 1.27 (0.96, 1.69)

Followed a special diet 15.4 ** **

Ate diet foods or products
 No (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 13.8 0.69 (0.48, 1.01) 0.48 (0.31, 0.72)

Took other pills, medicines, herbs, or supplements not needing a prescription 10.2 ** **

Joined a weight loss program
 No (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 9.9 1.24 (0.99, 1.56) 1.72 (1.00, 2.96)

Used a liquid diet formula 7.2 ** **

Took diet pills prescribed by a doctor
 No (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 3.5 1.77 (1.00, 3.13) 2.05 (1.09, 3.86)

Other method*** 18.7 ** **
*

The model was adjusted for gender, age, education, race/ethnicity, education level, income, self-reported health status, smoking status, diabetes status, BMI, and survey year. Strategies were retained in the model if they met significance at the p<0.10 level.

**

Did not meet criteria for retention in the model

***

Other method category includes those choosing “other method,” or other specified methods with cell sizes <50, or those choosing “ate fewer carbohydrates,” which was available only in the 2005–2006 survey year.