Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2012;14(3):289–303. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.672282

Table 2.

Correlations between Study Variables and Demographic Variables

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
1. Age 14 Negative T-S Int. --- .31* .41** .34** .42** −.12 .30* .01 −.13
2. Age 15 Sexual Risk-Taking .17 --- .61** .33** .20 .03 .39** −.11 −.18
3. Age 17 Sexual Risk-Taking −.10 .38** --- .36** .65** .14 .43** .07 −.05
4. Age 15 Romantic Placement −.17 .39** .41** --- .39** .05 .33** .13 .11
5. Age 17 Romantic Placement .18 .11 −.19 .03 --- .06 .28* .10 −.03
6. Dismissing Attachment −.14 .16 .22 .03 −.16 --- .38** −.21 −.24
7. Preoccupied Attachment .03 .10 .07 .21 .17 .40** --- −.10 −.06
8. Family Income .03 −.14 −.15 −.02 −.01 −.26* .10 --- .43**
9. Parental Marital Status −.02 −.16 −.22 −.12 .09 −.22 .00 .48** ---
*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

Note. Female estimates appear above the diagonal, male estimates appear below the diagonal; Female ns ranged from 55 to 70, male ns ranged from 48 to 62. T-S Int. = Teacher-Student Interaction.