Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Dec 29;43(2):168–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.004

Table 2.

Responses for Kirby’s Provider Survey of Incentives (Modified)

Survey Question Mean Item Score for Material Incentives (± SD)¥ Mean Item Score for Social Incentives (± SD)¥
Q1.Overall, I would be in favor of adding an incentive program to the court* 3.48 (±1.05) 4.19(±1.85)
Q2.Incentives are useful if they reward offenders for fulfilling treatment goals other than just providing a clean urine sample, such as regular attendance 3.63(±0.90) 3.78(±0.88)
Q3.Incentives help offenders achieve sobriety, allowing the counselor to focus on helping them make other life changes* 3.52(±0.81) 3.72(±0.77)
Q4.Giving incentives for drug-free urine samples helps the offender to become abstinent* 3.18 (±0.92) 3.50(±0.84)
Q5.An advantage of incentive programs is that they focus on what is good in the offender’s behavior (i.e., the ability to become abstinent), not what went wrong in their recovery 3.76(±0.80) 3.94(0.79)
Q6.Any source of abstinence motivation, not just internal motivation, is a good thing for treatment 3.72(±0.82) 3.95(0.73)
Q7.Incentives can be useful whether or not they address the underlying issues of addiction* 3.58(±0.87) 3.87(±0.67)
Q8.Many offenders will see rewards for abstinence as cheesy or artificial ® 3.44(±0.89) 3.56(±0.86)
Q9.Incentives are just not right because they are rewarding the offender for what he/she should be doing in the first place ® 3.49(±1.02) 3.83(±0.83)
Q10.It wouldn’t be right to give incentives to offenders for goals such as attendance if they aren’t testing negative (clean) ® 2.73(±1.09) 2.99(± 1.14)
Q11.Incentive programs are not consistent with my philosophy of treatment ® 3.54(±0.99) 3.87(±0.78)
Q12.Incentives are a bribe ® 3.67(±1.04) 3.91(±0.79)
Q13.The problem with incentives is that abstinence will only last for as long as the incentives are given ® 3.50(±1.01) 3.79(±0.80)
Q14.Giving incentives for treatment attendance will not improve attendance ® 3.57(±0.80) 3.72(± 0.72)
Q15.There are enough rewards in being clean; incentives aren’t necessary ® 3.54(±0.95) 3.82(±0.79)
Q16.Incentives don’t address the underlying issues of addiction ® 2.56(±0.97) 2.76(±1.06)
*

Items that did not load during factor analysis and were not used in calculation of overall scale means. These items were not used in the scales for Tables 3 and 4.

¥

Means are on a five-point scale (1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Agree Strongly)

®

Reverse coded.