Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 25;7(4):e35792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035792

Table 1. Docking ranks, physico-chemical properties, inhibition values, and ligand efficiencies for virtual screening hits.

ID Rank_total1 MW [g/mol] clogP IC50 [M] (SD)4 Hill slope (SD)4 Ligand efficiency [kcal/mol per non-hydrogen atom]
Rank_heav2
(Setup3)
1 4849 190 0.10 1.8·10−3 (3·10−4) 1.6 (0.2) 0.33
12
(4)
2 19401 203 0.34 5.9·10−4 (3·10−5) 1.7 (0.3) 0.53
3
(2)
3 16081 199 1.92 1.6·10−4 (9·10−6) 1.0 (0.1) 0.50
13
(3)
4 74 200 1.22 1.5·10−3 (3·10−4) 1.3 (0.2) 0.32
1
(4)
5 12374 166 −0.57 2.3·10−3 (6·10−5) 2.6 (0.2) 0.37
7
(3)
6 16249 149 0.67 3.5·10−3 (4·10−4) 2.2 (0.5) 0.28
7
(1)

For chemical structures see Figure 7.

1

using the total score of docking for ranking (after application of the pharmacophore filter).

2

using the score divided by the number of heavy atoms of the molecule for ranking (after application of the pharmacophore filter).

3

setup 1: His25 protonated at ND, no ADP present; setup 2: His25 protonated at ND, ADP present; setup 3: His25 protonated at NE, no ADP present; setup 4: His25 protonated at NE, ADP present.

4

average values of three independent measurements, standard deviation in brackets.