Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 24;52(13):9658–9664. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8559

Table 4.

The AUC for Detecting any VIP-Targeted Eye Conditions by Age

Screener AUC (95% CI)
3-Year-Olds 4- and 5-Year-Olds P (AUC Comparison between Age Groups)
VIP Phase I, Year 1 (n = 1142) (n = 215) (n = 927)
    NCR LEP 0.82 (0.76–0.89) 0.84 (0.81–0.87) 0.67
    Retinomax LEP 0.88 (0.81–0.94) 0.82 (0.79–0.86) 0.16
    P for AUC comparison between instruments 0.24 0.33
VIP Phase I, Year 2 (n = 1446) (n = 293) (n = 1153)
    Retinomax LEP 0.87 (0.81–0.92) 0.86 (0.83–0.88) 0.81
    SureSight LEP 0.84 (0.78–0.90) 0.87 (0.84–0.89) 0.48
    P for AUC comparison between instruments 0.41 0.67
VIP Phase II (n = 1452) (n = 377) (n = 1075)
    Retinomax Nurse 0.83 (0.79–0.88) 0.90 (0.87–0.92) 0.02
LAY 0.85 (0.80–0.89) 0.90 (0.87–0.92) 0.03
    P for AUC comparison between screeners 0.62 0.93
    SureSight Nurse 0.86 (0.81–0.90) 0.88 (0.86–0.91) 0.29
LAY 0.85 (0.80–0.89) 0.88 (0.85–0.90) 0.21
    P for AUC comparison between screeners 0.67 0.73
    P for AUC comparison between instruments 0.45 0.29