Skip to main content
. 2012 May 1;6(5):e1639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001639

Table 3. Replication of rRVF mutant viruses in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes.

Dissemination rates Transmission rates
Infection rate1 # pos/# exposed2 # pos/# infected3 # pos/# exposed4 # pos/# disseminated5
Virus Experiment Bloodmeal titer6 Avg (sd) day 0 titer7 % positive (n) % positive (n) % positive (n) % positive (n) % positive (n)
rRVF-wt 3 7.9 4.3 (0.2) 94.3 (35) 9.9 (131) 7.1 (28) 6.7 (30) 100.0 (2)
rRVF-wt 4 8.2 5.5 (0.4) 95.7 (25) 16.0 (25) 16.7 (24) 4.0 (25) 25.0 (4)
rRVF-ΔNSs 3 8.5 5.8 (0.2) 94.3 (35) 7.1 (113) 11.4 (35) 6.7 (30) 66.7 (3)
rRVF-ΔNSm 3 6.5 3.2 (0.2) 11.4 (35)* 0.8 (119)* 25.0 (4) 0 (30) 0 (1)
rRVF-ΔNSs-ΔNSm 4 8.3 6.2 (0.2) 66.0 (50)* 10.0 (50) 15.2 (33) 4.0 (50) 40.0 (5)
1

Number of mosquitoes containing detectable virus by plaque assay divided by number of mosquitoes exposed to infectious bloodmeal.

2

De = number of mosquitoes with RVFV antigen in head tissues divided by number of mosquitoes exposed to infectious bloodmeal.

3

Di = number of mosquitoes with RVFV antigen in head tissues divided by number of infected mosquitoes.

4

Te = number of mosquitoes with positive saliva by plaque assay divided by number of mosquitoes exposed to infectious bloodmeal.

5

Td = number of mosquitoes with positive saliva by plaque assay divided by number of mosquitoes with disseminated infection.

6

Titer expressed as log10 PFU/mL.

7

n = 3, titer expressed as log10 PFU/ml; avg is log10 geometric mean; sd is standard deviation.

*: value differs significantly from rRVF-wt values; see Table S2 for statistical analysis results.