Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2012 Mar 3;79(5):1185.e1–1185.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.016

Table 1.

Demographic, clinicopathologic characteristics and concentration of urinary proteins in the study cohort

Non-cancer (%)
N=63
cancer (%)
N=64
Median Age (range, y) 60 (30–81) 69.5 (22–90)
Male : Female ratio 55 : 8 55 : 9
Race
      White 41 (65) 58 (91)
      African American 8 (13) 0 (0)
      Other 14 (22) 6 (9)
Tobacco use 25 (40) 54 (84)
Gross hematuria 1 (2) 47 (73)
Suspicious/positive cytology 1 (2) 18 (28)
Median follow-up (months) 11.5 12.0
Clinical stage
      Tis^ n/a 6 (9)
      Ta n/a 15 (23)
      T1 n/a 9 (14)
      T2 n/a 31 (48)
      T3 n/a 4 (6)
      T4 n/a 2 (3)
      N+ ~ n/a 3 (5)
Grade
      Low n/a 9 (14)
      High n/a 55 (86)
Urinary Proteins Median (range) Median (range)
      VEGF (pg/ml) 0 (0 – 904.76) 335.34 (0 – 9841.4)
      Angiogenin (pg/ml) 44.58 (20.48–696.18) 410.98 (3.28 – 17944)
      CA9 (pg/ml) 0 (0 – 28.28) 10.36 (0 – 4132.9)
      BTA (U/ml) 12.55 (0.5 – 36.87) 179.34 (0 – 24865.4)
      Hemoglobin (ng/ml) 0 (0 – 125.92) 8.73 (0 – 130367.5)
^

4 subjects with concomitant cis had T1 (n=2) and T2 (n=2) disease

~

Subjects with T2 (n=1), T3 (n=1) and T4 (n=1) disease and node positive