Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Mar 30;8(3):188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.010

Table 4.

Cross-Sectional Multivariate Linear Regression Association of Cognitive Function between ACE-I and AT2RB Users Compared to No Antihypertensive Medication or Other Antihypertensive Medication Users

N 3MS TMT-A TMT-B CVLT-FRS CVLT-FRL CVLT-Sum RO-IR RO-DR RO_Copy
β SE β SE β SE β SE β SE β SE β SE β SE β SE
ACE-I vs. C 309 −.014 .31 .001 1.1 −.007 2.9 .018 .21 .011 .21 .001 .69 −.020 .30 −.012 .30 −.040 .20
ACE-I vs. O −.020 .33 −.009 1.2 −.025 3.2 .029 .23 .034 .23 .009 .72 .009 .31 .004 .31 −.013 .21
ACE-I BBBC vs. C 207 −.007 .36 .005 1.3 −.011 3.3 .004 .25 .002 .25 −.011 .81 −.028 .35 −.023 .35 −.015 .23
ACE-I BBBC vs. O .011 .38 −.002 1.3 −.023 3.7 .009 .26 .021 .27 −.010 .82 −.002 .35 −.009 .36 −.021 .23
ACE-I BBBNC vs C 102 −.015 .49 −.008 1.7 −.004 4.5 .031 .33 .016 .33 .022 1.1 −.001 .47 .008 .46 .012 .30
ACE-I BBBNC vs. O −.026 .51 −.016 1.8 −.019 5.0 .039 .35 .038 .35 .034 1.1 .017 .46 .021 .45 .009 .30
AT2RB vs. C 61 −.027 .62 −.009 2.2 −.001 5.7 .026 .42 .028 .42 .016 1.4 −.011 .59 .008 .59 .004 .38
AT2RB vs. O −.063 .64 −.020 2.3 −.014 6.3 .024 .43 .036 .44 .016 1.4 −.019 .58 −.006 .57 −.029 .38

β =beta coefficient, SE=standard error

3MS = Modified Mini Mental State Exam; TMT-A = Trail Making Test, Part A; TMT-B = Trail Making Test, Part B; CVLT = California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-FRS = short delayed free recall; CVLT-FRL = long delayed free recall; CVLT-Sum = Sum of trials 1 to 5 of List A); RO = Modified Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RO-IR = immediate recall; RO-DR = delayed recall; RO-Copy = Copy).

C = No antihypertensive medication use; O = Other antihypertensive medication use (calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, others).