Table 1.
Characteristics of participating physician practices
Characteristic | Number of practices (N=24)* |
Specialty | |
Primary care | 16 |
Medical or surgical specialty | 5 |
Multispecialty | 3 |
Number of physicians | |
1–9 | 12 |
10–49 | 7 |
50–500 | 5 |
Practice ownership | |
Physician | 17 |
Hospital | 6 |
Faculty practice | 1 |
Type of e-prescribing system† | |
Part of electronic health record system | 17 |
Stand-alone system | 7 |
Number of years prescriptions sent electronically | |
<2 | 12 |
2+ | 12 |
Estimated percentage of prescriptions sent electronically | |
<70 | 6 |
70+ | 17 |
Unknown | 1 |
Two practices were interviewed in each of the 12 Community Tracking Study (CTS) sites: Boston; Cleveland; Greenville, South Carolina; Indianapolis; Lansing, Michigan; Little Rock, Arkansas; Miami; northern New Jersey; Orange County, California; Phoenix; Seattle; and Syracuse, New York.
Twelve different commercial e-prescribing vendors were represented. Among the 17 practices using electronic health record systems, vendors included: Allscripts (4), eClinicalWorks (2), Epic (3), GE Centricity (2), GEMMS, McKesson, MedENT, NextGen (2), and one homegrown system. Stand-alone e-prescribing system vendors used in the remaining seven practices included: Allscripts (2), InstantDX, Prematic, RelayHealth (2) and DrFirst, which was integrated into a Greenway Medical Technologies electronic health record system.