Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 18;19(3):353–359. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000515

Table 1.

Characteristics of participating physician practices

Characteristic Number of practices (N=24)*
Specialty
 Primary care 16
 Medical or surgical specialty 5
 Multispecialty 3
Number of physicians
 1–9 12
 10–49 7
 50–500 5
Practice ownership
 Physician 17
 Hospital 6
 Faculty practice 1
Type of e-prescribing system
 Part of electronic health record system 17
 Stand-alone system 7
Number of years prescriptions sent electronically
 <2 12
 2+ 12
Estimated percentage of prescriptions sent electronically
 <70 6
 70+ 17
 Unknown 1
*

Two practices were interviewed in each of the 12 Community Tracking Study (CTS) sites: Boston; Cleveland; Greenville, South Carolina; Indianapolis; Lansing, Michigan; Little Rock, Arkansas; Miami; northern New Jersey; Orange County, California; Phoenix; Seattle; and Syracuse, New York.

Twelve different commercial e-prescribing vendors were represented. Among the 17 practices using electronic health record systems, vendors included: Allscripts (4), eClinicalWorks (2), Epic (3), GE Centricity (2), GEMMS, McKesson, MedENT, NextGen (2), and one homegrown system. Stand-alone e-prescribing system vendors used in the remaining seven practices included: Allscripts (2), InstantDX, Prematic, RelayHealth (2) and DrFirst, which was integrated into a Greenway Medical Technologies electronic health record system.