Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2011 Jan 20;36(6):669–673. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.009

Table 3.

Partial correlations between CLACS strength variables and percent days abstinent controlling or baseline use levels.

Proportion Days Abstinent
M SD 4m 16m 34m Overall

Session Period CLACS
Ability −0.70 0.94 .20 .14 .03 .16
Commit −0.11 0.57 .17 .06 .19 .14
Pre-PFR Desire 0.52 1.35 .08 .00 .17 .07
Reason 0.47 0.86 .25* .21* .27** .24*
Need 1.30 0.93 .13 −.07 .04 .04
Ability −0.46 0.84 .15 .28** −.02 .13
Commit −0.23 0.47 .08 .14 −.04 .02
PFR Desire 0.53 1.04 .30** .27** .34*** .29**
Reason 0.33 0.60 .29** .26** .18 .32**
Need 1.09 0.77 .17 −.07 .12 .03
Ability −0.25 1.22 .15 .29** .11 .21
Commit 1.02 0.86 −.11 .03 −.02 −.01
Post-PFR Desire 1.03 1.40 .02 .13 .09 .06
Reason 0.46 1.32 −.02 −.06 −.17 −.05
Need 1.26 0.91 −.03 −.11 −.09 −.14

n = 61 for Pre and PFR, n=56 for Post

*

p<0.1,

**

p<0.05,

***

p<0.01.