Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 22;11:53. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-53

Table 3.

The haplotypes and corresponding accession numbers for GenBank per sequenced sample per gene

asl clpc coI cytb
ind. ht. acc. nb. ht. acc. nb. ht. acc. nb. ht. acc. nb.
104 Pmu1 JN990725 Pmu1 JN990723 Pmu1 JN990718 Pmu1 JN990712
114 Pmu1 .. Pmu2 JN990724 - - Pmu1 ..
156 Pmu1 .. Pmu1 .. Pmu2 JN990719 Pmu2 JN990713
A2111 - Pme3 JN990720 Pme3 JN990714 Pme3 JN990708
A2112 Pme2 JN990726 Pme4 JN990721 Pme4 JN990715 Pme4 JN990709
A2113 - - Pme5 JN990722 Pme5 JN990716 Pme5 JN990710
A2114 - - - - Pme6 JN990717 Pme6 JN990711

Samples 104, 114 and 156 are Polychromophilus murinus, sampled from Myotis daubentoni and shared some haplotypes. The samples A2111-A2114 are Polychromophilus melanipherus from Miniopterus schreibersii and never shared haplotypes. For each unique haplotype, the GenBank accession number is mentioned only once in the table. '..': accession number already mentioned. '-': sequencing was unsuccessful.

None of the topologies obtained by independent analyses of the separate genes conflicted with the topology resulting from the concatenated alignment (Kishino-Hasegawa tests: cytb: Δlnl = 2.8, pKH = 0.432, coI: Δlnl = 12.1, pKH = 0.234, clpc: Δlnl = 9.3, pKH = 0.270), except for asl (Δlnl = 81.0, pKH < 0.001). Despite this strong rejection, both the ML and BI trees of asl had only few supported nodes and only closely related pairs were recovered (data not shown). A possible cause of the incongruence detected could be positive selection events in the evolution of the asl nuclear sequence [34]. However, analyses performed with Codeml [33] did not show signs of positive selection on the nuclear gene.