Table 5.

Comparison of $\widehat{{\mathbf{c}}_i}$ and $\widehat{{\mathbf{c}}_i^r}$ to target concentration values for experimental results, for the PaLS method. Best performance is highlighted in bold.

Experimental set 1, 10% ink and 90% dye
Fig.	# λ	Species	$\widehat{{\mathbf{c}}_i}\hspace{0.17em}[\%]$	$\widehat{{\mathbf{c}}_i^r}\hspace{0.17em}[\%]$	MSE
8(a)	6	Ink	4.8	21.0	1.2
8(a)	6	Dye	17.9	79.0	0.9
8(c)	126	Ink	5.8	7.7	1.1
8(c)	126	Dye	69.0	92.3	0.8

Experimental set 2, 70% ink and 30% dye
Fig.	# λ	Species	$\widehat{{\mathbf{c}}_i}\hspace{0.17em}[\%]$	$\widehat{{\mathbf{c}}_i^r}\hspace{0.17em}[\%]$	MSE
8(b)	6	Ink	38.3	80.0	1.1
8(b)	6	Dye	9.6	20.0	0.8
8(d)	126	Ink	27.6	81.0	0.6
8(d)	126	Dye	6.4	19.0	0.7