Skip to main content
. 2012 May 2;7(5):e36346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036346

Table 3. Proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to the twelve identified QTL regions.

Chromosome Candidate gene QTL-region [Basepairs] Number of SNPs within the QTL-region Proportion of phenotypic variance explained [%]
2 MCM6 59,128,137–64,128,137 1541 1.092
PAX3 108,706,088–113,706,088 1356 2.129
5 KITLG 15,706,817–20,706,817 1334 7.869
ERBB3 55,054,914–60,054,914 820 1.493
6 DKK2, LEF1 16,475,451–21,475,451 1501 1.077
KIT 69,882,208–74,882,208 1593 14.560
11 CRIM1 16,844,832–21,844,832 1514 0.857
13 ATRN 49,394,994–54,394,994 910 2.598
14 GSDMC 9,575,830–14,575,830 1384 1.398
22 - 25,431,961–30,431,961 1334 0.002
MITF 29,745,023–34,745,023 1356 11.332
NBEAL2 50,516,253–55,516,253 1507 0.548

A 5 Mb interval centred on the most significantly associated SNP was considered as QTL-region.

The genomic relationship matrix for each QTL was built based upon SNPs within the 5 Mb interval.

The proportion of phenotypic variance explained was then estimated with the effects off all chromosomes and QTL fitted simultaneously.