Table 1. CT Prevalence Studies in India.
Area | Year | Age group | Study population | N | Sample | Test | Prevalence | Ref |
Vellore, India | 1993 | Not available | Pregnant women | 273 | Endocervical swab | Chlamydiazyme kit (Abbott, USA) | 3.3% (95% CI: 1.2%–5.4%) | 5 |
New Delhi, India | 1995 | Mean Age: 34.9 yrs | Generally healthy women, Gynecological clinic(outpatient department) | 257 | Endocervical swab | Chlamydiazyme kit (Abbott, USA) | 23.3% | 14 |
Mumbai, Inner City | 1998 | ≤35 yrs | Suspected PID, Infertility | 446 | Endocervical swab | ELISA | 0.5% | 7 |
Mumbai | 2001 | 18–42 yrs | Gynecological clinic, complications associatedwith reproductive health | 123 | Endocervical swab | Chlamydiazyme kit (Abbott, USA) | 1.7 to 20% among different risk categories | 11 |
New Delhi | 2003 | 18–40 yrs | Symptomatic women Gynecological clinic | 280 | Endocervical swab | NAAT | 28% (18–25 yrs) | 13 |
New Delhi | 2003 | 19–36 yrs | Pregnant women | 350 | Endocervical swab | DFA & PCR | 18.8% (95% CI 14.76–22.96%) | 12 |
Tamil Nadu, South India | 2004 | 15–45 yrs | Healthy adult population, clinic | 1066 (serum)841 (urine)Female samples | Serum, urine | IgM-ELISA,urine NAAT | 3.3% ELISA, 1.1% PCR (95% CI: 0.4–1.8%) | 8 |
Chennai | 2005 | N/A | STI clinic(high risk) | 143 men & women | Serum, genital swab endocervical/urethral | Culture/nested PCR (MOMP): CT Serum: IgG | 30.8% by nested PCR(MOMP) | 9 |
Aligarh, North India | 2009 | 18–40 yrs | Obstetric clinic, secondary infertility, pregnant women (control subjects) | 70 | Endocervical swab | Cell culture, ELISA | 55%–2°infertility; 5.5% pregnant women | 10 |
Karnataka State,South India | 2010 | Mean age: 30.7 yrs | Symptomatic women Gynecological clinic | 412 | Endocervical swab | NAAT | 2.6%, vaginal discharge; 2.7% vaginal discharge with clinical cervicitis | 6 |
This table shows a review on Indian data which show a wide variation in CT prevalence and methods of laboratory confirmation.