Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Virology. 2004 Sep 15;327(1):144–154. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.06.035

Table 1.

Recognition of Gag EC by CTL from 17 EIAV-infected horses

Horse no. MHC class I haplotype
EC recognized
Alleles identified by sequencing (Chung et al., 2003) ELA-A type Virus stimulation EC peptide stimulation
A2147 7-1, 7-4 A4a 2, 3 2, 3, 4
A2150 104, 105, 106, 141 A1/W11 2 2
H593 113, 114 A1a 3 1, 3
H596 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 A4/W11 2, 3 2, 3
H610 111, 121, 122 A6a 2, 4 2, 4
H614 123, 124, 125, 126, 127 A9a 3 2, 3, 4
H629 Not done A3/A5 4 4
H631 133, 134, 135, 136 Undeterminedb 1, 2 1, 2, 3
A2140 Not done A1/W11 1 1, 2, 3, 4
H601 Not done A1/W11 1 1
H507c Not done A7/W11 1, 3 Not done
H513c Not done A5/A8 1 Not done
H521c Not done A1/W11 1, 3 Not done
H529c Not done A1/A5 1, 2 Not done
H532c Not done A5/A6 4 Not done
H540 109, 111 A5/A6 None None
A2153 107, 7-1, 7-4 A4a None None
a

Only one ELA-A type was detected with the antisera used (A1–A10 and W11).

b

Undetermined indicates that none of the available antisera reacted with lymphocytes from this horse.

c

Gag epitope mapping with CTL from these five horses was previously reported (Zhang et al., 1998).