Table 2.
FVC (% pred) |
FEV1 (% pred) |
FEV1/FVC (%) |
PEF (% pred) |
PMVV (L/min) |
TLC (% pred) |
FRC (% TLC) |
RV (% pred) |
RV/TLC (%) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women | 103 ± 15 | 100 ± 12 | 84 ± 6 | 101 ± 19 | 118 ± 19 | 100 ± 11 | 54 ± 7 | 96 ± 20 | 29 ± 6 |
Men | 103 ± 12 | 104 ± 8 | 84 ± 6 | 113 ± 12 | 176 ± 24 | 102 ± 12 | 48 ± 9 | 91 ± 26 | 22 ± 5 |
P value | ns | ns | ns | ns | < 0.0001 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Values are mean ± SD. FVC, forced vital capacity; % pred, percent of predicted; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; PEF, peak expiratory flow; PMVV, predicted maximal voluntary ventilation calculated from FEV1 (PMVV=37.5*FEV1); TLC, total lung capacity; FRC, functional residual capacity (expressed as % of TLC); RV, residual volume; and ns, non-significant. Predicted values for spirometry and lung volumes were based on the norms of Knudson et al. (21, 22), and Goldman and Becklake (17), respectively. ns, non-significant.