Table 1.
Study | Study groups | Measure of attention | Stimuli | Attention parameters (oriented/maintained attention) | Hunger/satiety intervention | Main findings: difference between OW/OB and NW subjects | Main findings: positive association between attention bias and subjective craving |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Castellanos et al. [14] | 18 OB and 18 NW women | ET during performance of a VPT | Pairs of pictures of HC/LC foods and non-food items | ET direction bias | Hunger (> 8 h) + satiety (shake 400 kcal; within-subjects design) | ET direction + duration bias: | Direction/duration bias ~ hunger |
ET duration bias | Hunger: OB = NW | ||||||
VPT RT bias 2,000 ms | Satiety: reduced in NW; retained in OB | ||||||
Werthmann et al. [15] | 22 OW/OB and 29 NW women | ET during performance of a VPT | Pairs of pictures of high-fat foods and non-food items | ET direction bias | Restrain from eating 2 h prior to testing; satiated with a lunch (400–500 kcal) before testing | ET direction bias: OW/OB > NW | In OW/OB: ET duration bias ~ craving |
ET first fixation duration bias | ET first fixation duration bias: OW/OB < NW | ||||||
ET duration bias | |||||||
VPT RT duration bias 2,000 ms | |||||||
Nijs et al. [16•] | 26 OW/OB and 40 NW women | ET, VPT, ERP | Pairs of pictures of HC foods and non-food items | ET direction bias | Hunger (17 h) + satiety (shake 600 kcal; between-subjects design) | RT bias 100 ms: OW/OB > NW, especially in hunger | In NW: P300 bias ~ hunger |
ET duration bias | P300 bias: | In OW/OB: VPT direction bias ~ hunger | |||||
VPT RT direction bias 100 ms | Hunger: OW/OB < NW | ||||||
VPT RT duration bias 500 ms | |||||||
P300 ERP bias | Satiety: OW/OB > NW | ||||||
Nijs et al. [17] | 20 OB and 20 NW men and women | ERP during a food-modified Stroop task | Words, referring to HC foods and non-food items | P200 ERP | Light meal 2 h prior to testing | P200 bias: OB > NW | In OB: Stroop RT bias ~ craving |
In NW: P200/P300 bias ~ craving | |||||||
P300 ERP | |||||||
Stroop RT | |||||||
Phelan et al. [22] | 15 long-term successful weight loss maintainers, 14 OB, 19 NW | Food-modified Stroop task | Words, referring to HC and LC foods | Stroop RT | Fasting state (>4 h) | Stroop RT interference HC words: successful dieters slower than OB/NW | – |
Loeber et al. [26] | 20 OB and 20 NW men and women | VPT | Pairs of pictures of foods and non-food items | VPT RT bias 50 ms | Restrain from eating 3 h prior to testing | – | – |
Graham et al. [31] | 15 OW/OB and 21 NW women | ET | Pairs of pictures of HC sweet foods; HC savory foods; LC foods | ET direction bias | – | Direction bias LC food: OW/OB > NW | – |
ET duration bias |
BMI body mass index; ERP event-related potentials; ET eye tracking; HC high-calorie; LC low-calorie; NW normal weight (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2); OB obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2); OW overweight (BMI 25–30 kg/m2); RT reaction time; VPT visual probe task