Skip to main content
. 2012 May 3;8(5):e1002685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685

Table 1. Average correlations between predicted genetic values and observed phenotypes for different CV procedures with GBLUP and different traits.

type of CV starvation resistance startle response
(4∶1)-CV1 all2 0.2393 (0.008) 0.230 (0.012)
(3∶2)-CV all 0.213 (0.006) 0.216 (0.011)
(2∶3)-CV all 0.176 (0.006) 0.181 (0.010)
(1∶4)-CV all 0.124 (0.006) 0.128 (0.006)
(4∶1)-CV male - female4 0.164 (0.007) 0.217 (0.011)
(4∶1)-CV female - male 0.182 (0.007) 0.235 (0.012)
(4∶1)-CV male - male 0.203 (0.008) 0.230 (0.012)
(4∶1)-CV female - female 0.254 (0.009) 0.216 (0.011)
1

Inline graphic-CV” means: Inline graphic parts are used as training set and Inline graphic parts are used as validation set.

2

The average of the medians of male and female measurements was used to predict line phenotypes. Predicted phenotypes were then correlated with the averages of the medians of male and female measurements.

3

Average correlation between predicted genetic values and observed phenotypes. Results are averages over 20 replicates. Standard errors of the means in parentheses.

4

“CV sexInline graphic sexInline graphic” means: Medians of measurements of sexInline graphic were used in the training set, medians of sexInline graphic were used in the validation set.