Table 3.
Summary of findings of Qualitative Studies that Investigated Experiences of Working as a Peer-Support Provider
| Study | Focused Theme | Informant | Method | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armstrong et al. 1995 [46] | Satisfaction, QOL and personal development benefits regarding the consumer volunteer program. | Consumer volunteers (n=23). | Semi-structured individual interviews. | Participants emphasized their relationship as empathetic human beings and reciprocal relationships. Through their changed sense of identity, they experienced positive changes in QOL. |
| Mowbray et al. 1996 [40] | Roles, benefits, challenges, structure and personal issues of peer specialists. | Peer support specialists who completed the training (n=11). | Focus group interviews. | Consumers as community support workers can make distinctive contributions to the support of their peers within the community and on the jobsite. |
| Mowbray et al. 1998 [42] | Benefits and problems of consumers as peer support specialists. | Former peer support specialists (n=11). | Semi-structured individual interviews. | Many benefits accrue to the peer-support specialists, but benefits identified for the mental health system appeared to be more limited, at least according to the PSS perspective. |
| Yuen & Fossey 2003 [45] | Rewards and challenges of working in recreation program. | Consumer-staff employed (n=3). | Semi-structured individual interviews. | Rewards were purposeful activity, wages, social networks, helping others, sense of ‘teamness’ and maintaining well-being. Challenges were negative feelings about the team process. |
| Doherty et al. 2004 [39] | Benefits and problems of having a consumer-employee within an assertive outreach team. | Consumer employees (n=2) and other team members (n=10). | Semi-structured interviews. | Benefits were increased self-esteem, hope, a positive role model and changes in staff’s attitudes towards the clients. The drawback was the high incidence of sick leave. |
| Gates & Akabas 2007 [50] | Policies, procedures and structures that support the contribution of peers. | Mental health agency staff (n=93) and peer providers (n=15). | Semi-structured telephone interviews and focus groups. | Respondents identified attitudes toward recovery, role conflict, lack of policies and practices around confidentiality, poorly defined job structure and lack of support for peer providers. |
| Chinman et al. 2008 [41] | Experiences in joining a team and the duties, roles and barriers of consumer-providers. | Consumer-providers (n=59) and supervisors (n=34). | Focus group interviews. | Consumer-providers provide a wide range of recovery-oriented services and are valued by staff and consumers. |
| Moll et al. 2009 [51] | Issues and challenges associated with integrating peer-support services into “traditional” mental health services. | Peer support workers (n=6) and managers (n=6). | An in-depth, semi-structured interview. | Central challenges included defining and establishing roles, balancing tensions between the peer and staff roles, negotiating the challenges of being a role model, transitioning identity from consumer to provider and fitting in or being accepted in the workplace. |