Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2011 Aug 4;36(12):1305–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.008

Table 2.

Logistic Regression for Alcohol & Marijuana Cognitions

Alcohol Cognition Marijuana Cognition

Full Model Parsimonious
Model
Full Model Parsimonious
Model
N 374 430 377 539
Wald chi2 33.14 33.35 86.67 117.82
Probability 0.005 0.000 0.00 0
Log Likelihood −96.16 −111.59 −141.6 −226.32

EGO ATTRIBUTES

Age 0.96 (.14) 0.85 (.10)
Gender 0.60 (.25) 0.43 (.14)** 0.63 (.15)*
Latino 2.72 (1.06)** 2.74 (.96)** 1.19 (.38)
SES 0.80 (.31) 0.91 (.29)
Popularity 1.06 (.09) 1.05 (.07)
In-School Friends 0.99 (.10) 1.03 (.09)
Network Condition 1.33 (.70) 0.94 (.37)
Standard Condition 1.92 (1.07) 1.34 (.56)

EGO EFFECTS

Drug Cognitions (T1) 1.52 (.44) 3.77 (1.03)*** 4.83 (.99)***
Drug Use (T2) 11.75 (12.51)** 14.42 (15.17)** 5.28 (2.27)** 6.04 (1.62)***
Drug Use (T1) 3.54 (2.42)* 4.08 (2.67)** 1.12 (.48)

ALTER EFFECTS

Friends' Drug Cognitions (T2) 5.97 (4.67)** 8.19 (5.17)*** 6.72 (3.08)***
Friends' Drug Cognitions (T1) 0.89 (0.51) 1.12 (.51)
Friends' Drug Use (T2) 1.54 (1.06) 0.90 (.45)
Friends' Drug Use (T1) 0.47 (.34) 1.56 (.84)
*

p<0.10,

**

p<0.05,

***

p<0.001