Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 29;13(4):4124–4140. doi: 10.3390/ijms13044124

Table 4.

Cytotoxic and hemolytic activity de Erytroxylum caatingae.

Products/Extracts Cell Line, IC50 (μg/mL) EC50 (μg/mL)

HEp-2 NCI-H292 K562
1 >50 >50 >50 n.t.
2 >50 >50 >50 n.t.
3 >50 25.76 ± 1.71 >50 >2000
4 >50 25.50 ± 1.08 >50 >2000
5 40.59 ± 0.72 28.19 ± 2.09 13.10 ± 0.63 >2000
6 34.12 ± 1.01 20.37 ± 0.75 9.86 ± 0.56 403.24 ± 9.64
7 8.25 ± 0.36 34.39 ± 1.71 11.21 ± 0.46 1036.52 ± 35.17
8 31.42 ± 1.01 15.79 ± 1.01 33.58 ± 1.33 510.00 ± 8.60
9 >50 >50 >50 n.t.
10 >50 >50 9.36 ± 0.77 >250
11 >50 >50 >50 n.t.
Etoposide 6.10 ± 0.19 2.75 ± 0.10 4.48 ± 0.23 n.t.

1: Methanol extract of stem of E. caatingae (MEEC); 2: AcOEt:MeOH (40:60); 3: AcOEt:MeOH (80:20); 4: AcOEt:MeOH (90:10); 5: AcOEt:MeOH (95:5); 6: acetate fraction (AcOEt); 7: chloroform fraction (CHCl3); 8: hexane fraction (C6H6); 9: Fraction total of alkaloids; 10: catuabine B; 11: 3α,6β-dibenzoyloxytropane; n.t.: not tested. The IC50 and EC50 and its 95% confidence interval (CI 95%) were obtained by non-linear regression. Data are presented as mean ± SD of two independent experiments. Each experiment was done in triplicate.