Table 2.
UVSD | DPSD | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data | ssa | r | P | ss | r | P | |
K&Y | Empirical data (p. 1540) | 30 | .17 | .36 | 31 | .56 | < .05 |
UVSD simulated data (N = 100) | 30 | .15 | 31 | .47 | |||
Exp 1 | Empirical data | 21 | .18 | .43 | 22 | .49 | < .05 |
UVSD simulated data (N = 100) | 21 | .30 | 22 | .57 |
Note. Correlation coefficients were calculated with the individual zROC slopes for each data set (upper row) and averaged across 100 simulated experiments (lower row); R-K = Remember-Know judgments; UVSD = unequal-variance signal-detection model; DPSD = dual-process signal-detection model; K&Y = Koen and Yonelinas (2010); Exp = experiment; ss = number of subjects; N = number of simulated data per subject.
K&Y reported that "One participant was excluded from this analysis because her or his estimated z-slope was greater than five standard deviations from the group mean” (p. 1540). The same was true for the data analysis of Exp 1.