Skip to main content
. 2012 May 7;6:60. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00060

Table 1.

This table summarizes subjects’ accuracy for gel electrodes in an earlier study (Guger et al., 2009) and dry electrodes in the present study.

Row-column speller classification accuracy in % Gel electrodes (N = 81; Guger et al., 2009) Dry electrodes (N = 23)
100 72.8 69.6
80–100 88.9 87.0
60–79 6.2 8.7
40–59 3.7 4.4
20–39 0.0 0
0–19 1.2 0
Average accuracy of all subjects 91.0 ± 18.5 90.4 ± 17.2

N specifies the number of subjects summarized in each column.