Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;21(1):12–18. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v21i1.10982

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline, cure rate (3 months) and re-infection rates for S.haematobium at 6 and 9 months follow up between the intervention and control groups.

Male Female
Follow-up Total n (%) Crude risk estimate Adjusted risk
estimate*
Total n (%) Crude risk estimate Adjusted risk
estimate*
OR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI) OR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI)
Baseline
Intervention 104 93(89.4) 0.40 (0.11, 1.32) 0.43 (0.14, 1.29) 114 103 (90.4) 0.60 (0.20, 1.76) 0.49 (0.18, 1.34)
Control 111 106 (95.5) 1 1 117 110 (94.0) 1 1
RR (95%CI) ARR (95%CI) RR (95%CI) ARR (95%CI)
3 months
Intervention 58 2 (3.4) 1.60 (0.23, 11.07) 1.44 (0.26, 7.88) 54 3 (5.6) 2.56 (0.44, 14.82) 4.13 (0.46, 36.67)
Control 93 2 (2.2) 1 1 92 2 (2.2) 1 1
6 months
Intervention 46 19 (41.3) 0.59 (0.41, 0.87) 0.58 (0.39, 0.86) 44 29 (65.9) 1.01 (0.77, 1.32) 0.79 (0.74, 1.26)
Control 72 50 (69.4) 1 1 72 47 (65.3) 1 1
9 months
Intervention 31 17 (54.8) 0.71 (0.51, 1.00) 0.73 (0.52, 1.03) 27 16 (59.3) 0.83 (0.58, 1.18) 0.79 (0.56, 1.12)
Control 74 57 (77.0) 1 1 63 45 (71.4) 1 1
*

adjusted for age