Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;21(1):12–18. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v21i1.10982

Table 3.

Comparison of prevalence of anaemia between intervention and control group

Male Female
Follow-up Total n (%) Crude risk estimate Adjusted risk
estimate*
Total n (%) Crude risk estimate Adjusted risk
estimate*
OR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI) OR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI)
Baseline
Intervention 80 17 (21.3) 1.03 (0.46, 2.34) 1.04 (0.58, 1.89) 73 11 (15.1) 0.42 (0.17, 0.99) 0.50 (0.23, 1.13)
Control 87 18 (20.7) 1 1 84 25 (29.8) 1 1
RR (95%CI) ARR (95%CI) RR (95%CI) ARR (95%CI)
9 months
Intervention 80 3 (3.8) 0.36 (0.10, 1.29) 0.34 (0.08, 1.35) 73 3 (4.1) 0.31 (0.09, 1.08) 0.31 (0.09, 1.10)
Control 87 9 (10.3) 1 1 84 11 (13.1) 1 1
*

adjusted for age