Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Apr 9;40(10):1315–1327. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1156-9

Table 2.

Subject characteristics in clinical pain assessment/quality of life scores and joint space width at baseline and after 24 months

Baselinea Change from baselineb


Patients Controls Diff. mean (95% CI) p values Patients Controls p values
Pain/quality of life scores
  Subject’s assessment of arthritis pain (VAS) 16 (0; 66) 1 (0; 12) <0.0001 0.8 0.0 0.060
  SF-36 physical component summary scale (PCS) 42.69±10.43 53.73±6.38 −11.0 (−15.5; −6.6) <0.0001 −0.77±9.55 −0.49±5.39 0.891
  SF-36 mental component summary scale (MCS) 54.99±10.45 54.88±5.50 0.1 (−4.2; 4.4) 0.961 −2.15±1.66 −0.73±1.06 0.465
WOMAC osteoarthritis index
  Pain 4 (0; 12) 0 (0; 1) <0.0001 1.5 1.0 0.293
  Stiffness 2 (0; 5) 0 (0; 1) <0.0001 1.0 1.0 0.397
  Function 14 (1; 40) 0 (0; 2) <0.0001 1.1 1.0 0.490
  Total 21.5 (0; 58.1) 0 (0; 4) <0.0001 1.1 1.0 0.090
Minimal joint space width (mm) 3.78±1.01 4.05±0.54 −0.3 (−0.7; 0.1) 0.189 −0.37±0.14 −0.09±0.04 0.021
a

Values at baseline are mean ± SD in the case of normally distributed data. Otherwise, median values and 10th and 90th percentiles are reported. Intergroup comparison of the absolute values was conducted with a t-test or a Mann-Whitney-U-test, respectively.

b

The rate of change during the 24 month-follow-up is reported as mean ± standard error of the mean in the case of normally distributed data. Otherwise, the factor of change of the median in comparison to its value at baseline is shown. Comparison of the slope was performed with generalized estimation equation (GEE) analysis after adjusting for age and BMI

P-values in bold indicate significant group differences