Skip to main content
. 2012 May;78(10):3774–3777. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07347-11

Table 1.

Antibiotic susceptibility of selected sphingomonads and effect of rpsL1

Strain Growth with each antibiotica
Wild type
+ pAK126a-rpsL1
Tc10 Km50 Ca50 Sm200 Sm50 and Tc10b
Sphingomonas sp. Fr1 (DSM 24958) + +
Sphingomonas sp. C3 (DSM 24957) + +
Novosphingobium rosa (DSM 7285) + +
Sphingomonas mali (DSM 10565) + +
Sphingomonas aerolata (DSM 14746) +c
Sphingobium indicum (DSM 16412) + +c
Sphingobium rhizovicinum (DSM 19845) + +
Sphingomonas roseiflava (CIP 106847) + +
Sphingomonas wittichii (DSM 6014) + +
a

Growth of wild-type strains (wild type) or otherwise-wild-type strains expressing rpsL1 from pAK126a (+ pAK126a-rpsL1) was assessed on nutrient broth (NB) supplemented with different antibiotics. Tc10, 10 μg tetracycline/ml; Km50, 50 μg kanamycin/ml; Ca50, 50 μg carbenicillin/ml; Sm200, 200 μg streptomycin/ml. +, growth after 2 days of incubation; −, no growth after 5 days of incubation.

b

A total of 10 μg tetracycline/ml was added for maintenance of pAK126a-rpsL1.

c

Growth was observed at a concentration of 50 μg streptomycin/ml but not at 200 μg streptomycin/ml.