Skip to main content
. 2012 May;78(9):3424–3430. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00142-12

Table 2.

Detection of B. microti group-specific rRNA gene by PCR in the field-collected ticks

Tick species Survey area Tick stage No. of ticks examined No. of ticks pooled No. of ticks tested No. of PCR-positive samples Minimum infection rate (%)a
I. ovatus Hokkaido Island
    Nemuro Adult 48 2 to 3 19 4 8.3b
    Kiyosato Adult 65 5 13 8 12.3
    Shimokawa Adult 100 5 20 2 2.0
    Aibetsu Adult 85 5 17 0 0
    Furano Adult 115 5 23 3 2.6
    Hobetsu Adult 140 5 28 10 7.1
    Ebetsu Adult 36 3 12 0 0
    Chitose Adult 68 4 to 5 15 0 0
Awaji Island
    Sumoto Adult 180 5 36 11 6.1
Subtotal 789 183 38
I. persulcatus Hokkaido Island
    Nemuro Adult 139 3 to 5 33 2 1.4
Nymph 196 1 196 0 0
    Horonobe Adult 42 3 14 0 0
    Kiyosato Adult 105 5 21 0 0
    Shimokawa Adult 15 5 3 0 0
    Aibetsu Adult 85 5 17 0 0
    Furano Adult 44 5 15 0 0
    Hobetsu Adult 36 33 13 0 0
    Ebetsu Adult 15 5 3 0 0
    Subtotal 677 315 2 0.3
Other tick species     Six areasc Adult 162 162 0 0
Total 1,656 542 40 2.4
a

Values (%) were calculated by comparing the number of pools that were PCR positive for the B. microti group to the total number of ticks examined. The calculation was based on the assumption that each PCR-positive pool contains at least one tick with a detectable B. microti group parasite(s).

b

Considering the impact of the comparison of MIRs, the possible MIR would be between 2 and 8.3% when 5 ticks were pooled.

c

Nemuro, Horonobe, Kiyosato, Hobetsu, Ebetsu, and Sumoto were included.