Table 2.
Tick species | Survey area | Tick stage | No. of ticks examined | No. of ticks pooled | No. of ticks tested | No. of PCR-positive samples | Minimum infection rate (%)a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. ovatus | Hokkaido Island | ||||||
Nemuro | Adult | 48 | 2 to 3 | 19 | 4 | 8.3b | |
Kiyosato | Adult | 65 | 5 | 13 | 8 | 12.3 | |
Shimokawa | Adult | 100 | 5 | 20 | 2 | 2.0 | |
Aibetsu | Adult | 85 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
Furano | Adult | 115 | 5 | 23 | 3 | 2.6 | |
Hobetsu | Adult | 140 | 5 | 28 | 10 | 7.1 | |
Ebetsu | Adult | 36 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 0 | |
Chitose | Adult | 68 | 4 to 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
Awaji Island | |||||||
Sumoto | Adult | 180 | 5 | 36 | 11 | 6.1 | |
Subtotal | 789 | 183 | 38 | ||||
I. persulcatus | Hokkaido Island | ||||||
Nemuro | Adult | 139 | 3 to 5 | 33 | 2 | 1.4 | |
Nymph | 196 | 1 | 196 | 0 | 0 | ||
Horonobe | Adult | 42 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
Kiyosato | Adult | 105 | 5 | 21 | 0 | 0 | |
Shimokawa | Adult | 15 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
Aibetsu | Adult | 85 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
Furano | Adult | 44 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
Hobetsu | Adult | 36 | 33 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
Ebetsu | Adult | 15 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
Subtotal | 677 | 315 | 2 | 0.3 | |||
Other tick species | Six areasc | Adult | 162 | 162 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 1,656 | 542 | 40 | 2.4 |
Values (%) were calculated by comparing the number of pools that were PCR positive for the B. microti group to the total number of ticks examined. The calculation was based on the assumption that each PCR-positive pool contains at least one tick with a detectable B. microti group parasite(s).
Considering the impact of the comparison of MIRs, the possible MIR would be between 2 and 8.3% when 5 ticks were pooled.
Nemuro, Horonobe, Kiyosato, Hobetsu, Ebetsu, and Sumoto were included.