Table 1.
Studies included in systematic review.
| Reference | Country | Fuel choice | Statistical model | No. of analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adkins et al. 2010 | Malawi | LED lanterns (charged by solar panel) | Probit | 1 | ||||
| Amacher et al. 1992 | Nepal | Biomass ICSs | Probit | 1 | ||||
| Amacher et al. 1996 | Nepal | Biomass ICSs | Probit | 2 | ||||
| Arthur et al. 2010 | Mozambique | Fuel choice (charcoal, kerosene, electricity) | Logit | 4 | ||||
| Chaudhuri and Pfaff 2003 | Pakistan | Fuel choice (modern fuels, traditional fuels) | Engel curves, probit | 1 | ||||
| Damte and Koch 2011 | Ethiopia | Lakech ICS, Mirt ICS | Weibull regression model, exponential, Koch | 2 | ||||
| Edwards and Langpap 2005 | Guatemala | Gas ICSs | Full information maximum likelihood | 2 | ||||
| El Tayeb Muneer and Mukhtar Mohamed 2003 | Sudan | ICSs | Linear regression | 1 | ||||
| Farsi et al. 2007 | India | Fuel choice | Ordered probit | 1 | ||||
| Gebreegziabher et al. 2009 | Ethiopia | Fuel choice (wood, charcoal, kerosene, electricity), electric ICS | Probit | 5 | ||||
| Gundimeda and Köhlin 2008 | India | Fuel choice (fuelwood, kerosene, LPG, electricity) | Linear approximate almost ideal demand system | 24 | ||||
| Gupta and Köhlin 2006 | India | Fuel choice (fuelwood, coal, kerosene, LPG) | Probit | 4 | ||||
| Heltberg 2004 | Brazil, South Africa, Vietnam, Guatemala, Ghana, Nepal, and India | Fuel switching (partial to full use of nonsolid fuel, partial use of nonsolid fuel to only solid fuel) | Logit | 28 | ||||
| Heltberg 2005 | Guatemala | Fuel choice (fuelwood, LPG) | Multinomial logit | 3 | ||||
| Hosier and Dowd 1987 | Zimbabwe | Fuel choice [transitional fuels (coal and dung), fuelwood, kerosene, electricity] | Logit | 10 | ||||
| Jack 2006 | Peru | Fuel choice (wood only, gas only, wood and gas) | Probit | 3 | ||||
| Kavi Kumar and Viswanathan 2007 | India | Fuel choice [“dirty” fuel (firewood, dung, coal, and coke) vs. “clean” fuel (kerosene, gobar gas, LPG)] | Probit | 12 | ||||
| Kebede et al. 2002 | Ethiopia | Fuel choice (kerosene, butane gas, electricity) | Regression | 1 | ||||
| Kemmler 2007 | India | Fuel choice (electricity) | Probit | 1 | ||||
| Khandker et al. 2010 | India | Fuel choice (biomass, kerosene, LPG, electricity) | Tobit | 8 | ||||
| Lamarre-Vincent 2011 | Indonesia | Fuel choice (kerosene, LPG) | No fixed effects, fixed effects | 1 | ||||
| Louw et al. 2008 | South Africa | Fuel choice (electricity) | Logarithmic regression | 1 | ||||
| McEachern and Hanson 2008 | Sri Lanka | Single household solar system adoption | Multivariate linear regression | 2 | ||||
| Ouedraogo 2006 | Burkina Faso | Fuel choice (agricultural waste, cow dung, charcoal, firewood, kerosene, LPG) | Multinomial logit | 4 | ||||
| Peng et al. 2010 | China | Fuel choice (biomass, nonbiomass) | Logit | 1 | ||||
| Pine 2011 | Mexico | Patsari ICSs | Multinomial logistic regression | 1 | ||||
| Rao and Reddy 2007 | India | Fuel choice (firewood, coal, coke, dung, charcoal, kerosene, LPG) | Multinomial logit | 4 | ||||
| Rebane and Barham 2011 | Nicaragua | Solar home system | Biprobit, probit | 1 | ||||
| Reddy 1995 | Bangalore, India | Fuel choice (firewood, charcoal, kerosene, LPG, electricity) | Multinomial logit | 8 | ||||
| Walekhwa et al. 2009 | Uganda | Fuel choice (biogas) | Binomial logistic regression | 1 | ||||
| Wendland et al. 2011 | Benin and Togo | ICSs | Probit | 1 | ||||
| Yan 2010 | China | Fuel choice (wood straw, coal, LPG, electricity) | Marginal effects of multinomial logit | 6 | ||||