Skip to main content
. 2012 May;86(9):5192–5203. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06283-11

Table 1.

Comparison between physical and infectious titers of MV-derived LVs versus VSV-G-LVs obtained with different cell linesa

Vector (100× concentrated) Mean titer ± SD
293T (TU/ml) CHO-SLAM (TU/ml) Raji (TU/ml) p24 (ng/ml)
H/F-LVs 4.7E6 ± 4,5E6 4.1E 7 ± 2.9E7 6.7E7 ± 2.1E7 155 ± 67
VSV-G-LVs 4.5E8 ± 1.8E8 8.4E7 ± 1.5E7 7.4E8 ± 1.1E7 182 ± 62
a

Supernatants of 293T producer cells were concentrated 100-fold by low-speed centrifugation. Titers for the 293T, CHO-SLAM, and Raji cells were assessed by adding serial dilutions of each vector preparation to the appropriate target cell. For each vector, the percentage of GFP+ cells was analyzed at day 3 posttransduction. Vectors were titered on 293T, CHO-SLAM, and Raji cells. Titers are expressed as mean transduction units (TU) per ml (n = 6). For the p24 cells, the titers are expressed as the p24 level (in ng/ml) determined by ELISA that represents a measure for the total physical particles present in the vector preparation.