Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2012 Mar 21;107(7):1246–1260. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03780.x

Table 3.

Model-based functional form and key features of the association between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease, by sex and end point, 1980–2010

Sex Stratum Functional form (x = average alcohol intake, g/day) No. of Studies Age at Time of IHD Event, years Nadir, g/day Reversion Point, g/daya P Value for Heterogeneity I2, % (95% CI)
Stratified only (n = 24 studies)
Men Mortality log RR = x0.5 + x3 17 65 32 63 <0.001 51 (35–63)
Morbidity log RR = x0.5 + ln(x)* x0.5 9 63 69 - 0.001 46 (21–63)
Women Mortality log RR = x + ln(x)* x 8 67 11 31 0.014 56 (45–64)
Morbidity log RR = x0.5 + x 5 63 14 57 <0.001 58 (31–74)
All estimates (n = 44 studies)
Men Mortality log RR = x0.5 + x3 34 57 37 - <0.001 54 (44–63)
Morbidity log RR = x0.5 + ln(x)* x0.5 28 56 72 - <0.001 46 (32–58)
Women Mortality log RR = x + ln(x)* x 18 58 23 62 <0.001 51 (34–64)
Morbidity log RR = x0.5 + x 17 63 29 - <0.001 59 (44–69)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

a

Point where the risk function for average alcohol intake turns into a detrimental association with ischaemic heart disease