Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Theor Biol. 2012 Mar 23;303:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.03.014

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The strategy distributions in the low mutation case as the selection strength varies, determined numerically with a population size of 200 (Nowak, 2006). Here R = 2 and M = 100. As the selection strength δ increases, the distribution moves from one with the weight around the “cooperative” strategies to one with the weight around the “selfish” ones. The average strategy for each distribution is marked by a red line.