Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Mar 12;21(2):S88–S102. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0106)

Table 4.

Cross-Correlation Results (R Values Reported in Parenthesis) for Untrained Structures That Show a Correlation with the Trained Structure for Each Patient

OM Training Trained Structure Positive Correlations Negative Correlations

Patient Negative Lag 0 Lag Positive Lag Negative Lag 0 Lag Positive Lag

BUMA10 OR with ORCNP (.839)
BUMA21 OR
BUMA05 OC
BUMA20 OC with OR (.947)
with ORCNP (.630)
BUMA11 PA with OC (.665) with 3NP (−.723)
with ORCNP (−.641)
BUMA14 PA
BUMA24 UNACC with 3NP (.751) with PA (.811)
SPM Training Trained Structure Positive Correlations Negative Correlations

Patient Negative Lag 0 Lag Positive Lag Negative Lag 0 Lag Positive Lag

BUMA03 OR with 3NP (.900) with UNACC (.606)
with ORCNP (.627)
BUMA17 OR No effects
BUMA15 OC with PA (.594)
BUMA07 OC No effects
BUMA13 PA
BUMA16 PA with UNACC (.740)
with OC (.675)
with OR (−.758)
with 3NP (−.707)
BUMA08 UNACC
BUMA23 UNACC with OR (.635)

Note. Only correlations that exceed .60 and two standard errors are reported. Negative lags indicate lags of −1, −2, −3 sessions, positive lags indicate 1, 2, or 3 sessions, 0 lag indicates a change on the same session. Positive correlations indicate both structures improved, negative correlations indicate that as one structure improved, the other decreased.