Skip to main content
. 2012 May;8(3 Suppl):e31s–e37s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000548

Table 2.

Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis: IMRT Cost-Effectiveness (ICER) Varying QoL and Efficacy for SBRT

QoL (%) Change (%) Efficacy at 5 Years (bPFS)
−6% −4% −2% Base 2% 4%
0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94
0.765 −5.0 8,232 8,987 10,254 11,678 13,286 15,115
0.864 −4.0 20,238 27,919 36,841 49,979 76,013 134,220
0.873 −3.0 23,238 30,380 40,921 58,390 92,879 192,587
0.891 −1.0 40,110 50,361 81,585 175,170 * *
0.9 Base 52,918 75,037 162,151 * * *
0.909 1.0 77,742 164,700 * * * *
0.927 3.0 222,674 * * * * *
0.945 5.0 * * * * * *

NOTE. ICER per QALYs gained for IMRT when relaxing the assumptions for SBRT efficacy and utility. All ICERs are expressed in $/QALYs.

Abbreviations: bPFS, biologic progression-free survival; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy; QoL, quality of life; SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy.

*

Dominated.