Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2011 Feb 8;2(2):77–89. doi: 10.1007/s13239-011-0038-6

Table 1.

Comparison between measured and CFD simulated peak pressure gradient and peak velocity at the orifice for two orifice shapes (circular and rectangular) and for two flow conditions.

Peak Δp Peak Velocity

Measured (mmHg) CFD Simulated (mmHg) % Difference Measured (cm/s) CFD Simulated (cm/s) % Difference

Circular Orifice
 30 ml 40 43.8 9.5 317 332 4.7
 70 ml 129 123 4.6 567 539 4.9

Rectangular Orifice
 30 ml 52 43.8 15.7 359 332 7.5
 70 ml 140 128 8.6 591 562 4.9

Combined Mean 90 85 10.4 459 442 5.7