Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;9(4):2586–2610. doi: 10.3390/s90402586

Table 3.

Testing results summary.

Method POS RMS value Improvement (%)

Original(KF) Compensated Against KF Against RTS

Tj-1 (KF + ANN) North(m) 25.28 4.18 79 --
East(m) 23.15 6.57 72 --
Height(m) 6.45 0.85 87 --
Roll(deg) 0.982 0.244 75 --
Pitch(deg) 0.753 0.283 63 --
Heading(deg) 48.702 8.043 84 --

Tj-2 (KF+ ANN) North(m) 28.54 6.21 78 --
East(m) 23.12 7.58 67 --
Height(m) 5.12 0.75 85 --
Roll(deg) 0.782 0.212 73 --
Pitch(deg) 0.854 0.381 55 --
Heading(deg) 13.25 2.18 84 --

Method POS Original(RTS) Compensated Against KF Against RTS

Tj-1 (RTS+ ANN) North(m) 0.43 0.18 99 58
East(m) 0.32 0.15 99 53
Height(m) 0.23 0.08 99 65
Roll(deg) 0.543 0.125 87 78
Pitch(deg) 0.325 0.083 89 74
Heading(deg) 24.325 3.854 92 84

Tj-2 (RTS + ANN) North(m) 0.38 0.17 99 55
East(m) 0.34 0.13 99 62
Height(m) 0.27 0.09 99 67
Roll(deg) 0.256 0.103 81 60
Pitch(deg) 0.312 0.124 85 61
Heading(deg) 4.875 1.235 89 75

Remark --Left blank intentionally