Skip to main content
. 2012 May 9;7(5):e36824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036824

Table 4. Partworth Utilities For Each Attribute Level And Relative Importance Of Attributes.

Attribute Utility* 95% CI Importance 95% CI
Health status 50.0% (47.7% , 52.0%)
light disease −0.483 (−0.500 , −0.465)
severe disease 0.483 (0.466 , 0.500)
Quality of life 24.7% (22.9% , 26.3%)
no restrictions −0.262 (−0.286 , −0.238)
restricted 0.047 (0.023 , 0.072)
severely restricted 0.215 (0.193 , 0.236)
Age 12.0% (10.1% , 14.0%)
25 years 0.052 (0.021 , 0.082)
43 years 0.086 (0.058 , 0.113)
68 years 0.009 (−0.018 , 0.036)
87 years −0.147 (−0.176 , −0.118)
Family status 7.9% (6.0% , 9.8%)
single w/o dependents 0.0081 (−0.019 , 0.035)
single with dependents 0.086 (0.057 , 0.115)
couple w/o dependents −0.067 (−0.095 , −0.039)
couple with dependents −0.027 (−0.056 , 0.002)
Occupational status 4.6% (2.9% , 6.2%)
high −0.038 (−0.062 , −0.014)
medium −0.013 (−0.037 , 0.011)
low 0.051 (0.029 , 0.073)
Unhealthy life style 0.8% (0.04% , 2.3%)
yes 0.008 (−0.008 , 0.024)
no −0.008 (−0.024 , 0.008)
*

Estimation by maximum likelihood method, SAS PROC PHREG, option ties = breslow ([32]).