Skip to main content
. 2012 May 9;7(5):e36345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036345

Table 2. Accelerometer-derived and IPAQ-estimates indices of physical activity and sedentary behaviour.

Accelerometer-derived vs IPAQ-reported activity measure Accelerometer IPAQ Difference [IPAQ minus accelerometer] p b r (95% CI) Pc (95% CI)
(Mean ± SD) (Mean ± SD) (Mean (Limits of Agreement))
Sedentary vs. Sitting (min.day−1) 523.1±90.9 454.2±103.1 −68.8 (−228.3 to 90.8) <0.0001 0.654 (0.570 to 0.738) 0.519 (0.402 to 0.697)
Moderate vs. Moderatea (min.day−1) 33.7±23.7 88.5±63.1 54.8 (−55.7 to 165.3) <0.0001 0.458 (0.359 to 0.556) 0.182 (0.103 to 0.291)
Vigorous vs. Vigorous (min.day−1) 2.6±4.8 10.4±9.4 7.8 (−10.7 to 26.4) <0.0001 0.259 (0.146 to 0.360) 0.134 (0.092 to 0.339)
MVPA vs. MVPAa (MET.min.day−1) 155.9±117.9 397.8±248.3 241.9 (−177.6 to 661.5) <0.0001 0.508 (0.412 to 0.603) 0.222 (0.126 to 0.367)

N = 317,

a

moderate and MVPA domains for IPAQ include walking.

b

p-value for comparison between accelerometer and IPAQ mean values.

Limits of Agreement expressed as the mean difference between methods ±1.96×SD. r = Pearson correlation coefficient; Pc = concordance correlation coefficient.